Sunday, July 20, 2014

Journal Entries Week 7/7 – 7/10

Journal Entries Week 7/7 – 7/10

Monday:          Monday marked my first day at the Intensive Outpatient Clinic (IOC) of Denver Health, and it proved to be an eventful one. I arrived shortly after the clinic had opened as was soon introduced to Dr. Cynthia Crews, a busy woman who only came in to the IOC three days a week. After finishing with her first patient of the day, she sat down with me and took some time to get to know me and tell me about herself. She described herself in a unique way: she was part-doctor, part-social worker. Of course, she did not mean by education or instruction, but rather by practice. Soon, I saw this to be true. The patients who came into the clinic were seen for one hour on their first visit and a half-hour on any subsequent ones. Nonetheless, most of the doctors in the clinic took an hour or more to see nearly every patient, sacrificing their lunch breaks and staying late if needed. This was a place where the holistic patient was considered, for life habits and mental states were as important to physical health as anything else. Dr. Crews demonstrated this with her first patient. This woman had been a longtime patient of the doctor, and there was a familiarity about their interactions which was evident, even to me. Nonetheless, as Dr. Crews began to question the woman about her medications, their eyes locked, and a struggle seemed to ensue. The woman claimed to have been diligent, but the doctor’s steady gaze was sternly mistrusting. Under the firm gaze, the woman seemed to lose some of her ability to lie, and steadily admitted things she had intended to hide. After the appointment, I spoke with Dr. Crews, noting the nonverbal communication that took place. She agreed, sometimes there needed to be a struggle which took neither words nor actions, but only a message conveyed in a look.
            The next patient for the day was a man who had never been seen before in the Intensive Outpatient Clinic. Dr. Crews spent some time getting to know him and his various conditions, extending from his heart to his feet. Dr. Crews suspected, also, that there may be some interesting diagnoses to be made within his head, though by someone more psychologically-minded. He was homeless, like many of the patients the clinic saw, and was open to some information provided by the social worker, Katie, whom I followed into his room. She spoke with him about shelters and day clinics. However, he sought somewhere where he could stay for the day without being forced to vacate and look for a job. This sort of provision was few and far between, and generally only afforded to the very ill. Regardless, Katie and Dr. Crews extended the help they could to the man. In addition to providing resources, they offered a sort of therapeutic problem solving. In reference to our own psychological studies, it seemed as if the women employed both emotion- and problem-focused reasoning, as needed. Seeing these strategies in action was far more beneficial than experiencing them in a textbook. The man was sent on his way, after nearly two hours in the clinic.
After a few more patients, Dr. Crews left in the early afternoon and a new doctor took over the clinic, Dr. Joshua Blum. This man seemed to have little more than a second to spare, and for good reason. Rushing between an HIV clinic in the mornings and the IOC in the afternoons, while also putting in some time at a state prison facility, Dr. Blum was busy. Nonetheless, he took me in with him to see a slew of patients over the span of the afternoon. I saw in him the same pat-social worker affectations which Dr. Crews had shown. One of his first patients was a middle-aged woman with a slightly reserved attitude. After talking a bit about her health and weight, Dr. Blum asked her to speak about her life at home with her husband. Soon, tears erupted as she spoke of the man who didn’t seem to desire her any more. Her aging and health issues had caused small changes in her body, such as losing body hair, and her husband no longer wanted to engage her sexually or sleep in the same bed as her. He had made comments which had not seemed very meaningful to him, but were all but destroying her. Dr. Blum responded empathetically to all of his patient’s stories, and calmly advised her to speak to her husband about how he was making her feel. Her depression, no doubt, would benefit from better treatment from him. The patient gained her composure and nodded, thanking the doctor for his words. I felt drawn, myself, to console her, but decided to leave that to Dr. Blum. As she left, she seemed to at least have a plan for how to fix the things that were most disrupting her life. Some patients got more psychotherapy than physiology, it seemed. With one man, Dr. Blum even took the time to explain some of the handout “5 Wishes,” which details what someone wants to be done with them if their judgment is compromised, or if they pass away. It was important for this patient to understand the implications that came with health conditions, and not just the conditions themselves. It was not just health care that the doctor had provided, but general care. It was almost a behavioral medicine which the doctors practiced, introducing the inherent psychology behind conditions into their practices as methods to diagnose and treat patients’ cases.
One of the last patients of the day came in bragging about her previous night’s meal. At 1:30 in the morning, she had eaten barbeque ribs, chicken, potato salad, cornbread, and a tall glass of lemonade. She talked about it joyfully, all but licking her lips. Dr. Blum, of course, was less joyful. She tried to explain to her that her insulin shots were not enough to keep her diabetes at bay if she ate so poorly on a consistent basis. She seemed to understand, and yet also seemed to dismiss his advice.  For her, this was simply what she ate. Smoking was simply what she did, as well. And, to her, these things were unchangeable. Medications, she could manage. In fact, she requested a set of vitamins to help her nail and hair health. But anything outside of her comfort zone was quickly dismissed. Dr. Blum finished with the woman, shaking his head. There are just some people you can’t help, he told me. After another patient or two, Dr. Blum’s day way over, and I thanked him and looked forward to the next day.

Tuesday:         The second day of the week, my shadowing focused exclusively on Dr. Vishnu Kulasekaran, a sociable and high-energy doctor. He saw a whole set of patients throughout the day. Many suffered from health conditions and severe depression. Others added previous addiction to the list. Dr. Vishnu allowed me to ask questions of the patient, and help him build confidence by chatting with new patients. He asked patients to call him Dr. K and had a way about him which was both charming and trustworthy. If I had anything to learn from him, it was how to interact with a patient. He took just as much time to listen to patients’ feelings, thoughts, and personal lives as he did to make a diagnosis. No doubt, his diagnoses benefitted from the time he spent learning anything and everything about patients. As patients passed out of the IOC, they did so with a smile and a resounding feeling that things were better than they had been 30 minutes or an hour before.
            The final two patients of the day were some of the most interesting. The first was a woman who brought her daughter along. Though, perhaps, the more proper way to phrase this would be to say that the daughter brought the mother with her. The mother was scarcely able to formulate a sentence on her own, between the overall weakness in her slim frame and the shortness of her breath. She was dying. This was the sad but simple truth. What was needed now was to talk about hospice and power of attorney. The most surprising part of the situation was the way that the mother and daughter took the news. They were strong or resigned, wise or apathetic, for they took the news with nods and listened intently to Dr. K’s instruction about what hospices were nearby and what the “5 Wishes” were. The old woman cared only that her children and grandchildren were provided for by the little that she left them. As the pair left, slowly, Dr. K shared his happiness that the encounter had gone as well as it did with me. “I wasn’t sure if we should have that conversation today,” he said, “But you have to sort of read the room.”
Then we saw the last patient of the day, a very overweight woman, with an oxygen tube extending from her nose. I was briefed beforehand: this was the most depressed woman that Dr. K had ever known. She was chronically suicidal, and had a past filled with pain and sadness. She and the doctor had a calm conversation; she seemed very open with him. She had been taking her medications and had a few concerns with her health and her mood. Then, the conversation turned to her depression. The response she gave to the doctor’s questioning on this was incredible. She said, “You know, Dr. K, I still don’t want to be here. You know that. But this who team—system—its made me think, maybe, I’ll just give it a shot.” Dr. K nodded, but I couldn’t hide a warm smile. This woman, who had failed at suicide attempts time and time again and still lived with chronic health and mental health issues, was thinking about staying alive. If there was a better way to end the day, I couldn’t think of it. The psychology behind the interaction was obvious, yet also too beautiful to fully encapsulate. I left for the day, happy to return the day after the next, on Thursday.

Thursday:        Thursday was to be my last day at the Intensive Outpatient Clinic of Denver Health. I arrived in the bullpen to find Dr. Jeremy Long going through paperwork. He informed me that it would be a slow morning. We talked while he finished filling in notes from previous days. Then, a patient finally made his way into the office. The man had many of the usual conditions: smoking had worn down his cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Yet he wasn’t taking his medications. Dr. Long found that he hadn’t even been filling the prescriptions which he claimed he had. The reason? Money. The $0.15 copays on the man’s monthly supplies of medicine were too much, according to the man. Dr. Long, of course, doubted that this was true. The patient was another example of the resistance which many had shown at the Denver Rescue Mission. Sometimes, conformity to rules and guidelines seems to be too much for individuals. Perhaps it is obedience itself which is the problem. If people were not told what to do, they may not be opposed to doing it. I was sympathetic to this attitude, yet also recognized its part in perpetuating the positions which many indigent people are in.
The next patient was even more interesting. He was a homeless man who felt that society should provide him a place to eat, drink, and sleep alone, in peace. Admittedly, the part of that triad which he preferred was drinking, and he wanted to do it “as a recluse.” When Dr. Long began talking to him about resources which might require him to play by someone else’s rules, the man began to yell, “You don’t know shit about me!” and Dr. Long later stated, “That’s where I lost him.” The man spoke also with the addiction councilor, but there was little for them to do. The man did not want the help available. The need for a psych evaluation was noted, for the man likely had a borderline personality disorder. It seemed as if the root of his entire situation may have been more concerned with mental than physical health.
For a few hours, Dr. Long and Dr. Blum, when he arrived, saw more patients: a mother whose daughter did much of her translating, a man who spoke merrily in Spanish to Dr. Blum about his heart condition, and a man who did not seem to want to take his medications, because he usually forgot to before bed. This latter man was homeless, as well, and did not even want a free glucometer, for he thought it would take up too much room in his small satchel. The man repeatedly said that the solution for his health was housing. If he could get a place to live, he could take his insulin and care for his heart. Until then, he refused to take any sort of initiative over his health. Dr. Blum was not able to help him greatly, but scheduled a future visit, as usual. A few more patients were seen. One man upped his own Oxycodone dosage, without Dr. Blum’s direction. Another patient was the perfect example of a distended jugular vein.

The last man of the day, however, was the most interesting of all. As I entered the room, he greeted me warmly, for we recognized each other from the food line at the Denver Rescue Mission. He then approached much of the check-up with Dr. Blum as would any other. But this man was different, though he did not appear to be. He had been seen by doctors 540 times within the past year and was, quite literally, the single greatest user of Medicare within the entire state of Colorado, by a considerable margin. He was a known abuser of cocaine and the pain pills he received. The man spoke of being prescribed medications which he had not picked up yet and stated that he was in a hurry to get to the Denver Rescue Mission for the night. He left quickly after a brief conversation with Dr. Blum. Dr. Blum told him that he had to check on how much the hospital had prescribed him in medications, before he picked them up. Only after the man had gone and Dr. Blum had called down to the hospital did the truth come out: a new resident had prescribed far too much of each pain-reliever to a known user—a thirty day supply. He had already picked up the supply before seeing Dr. Blum, and was now on his way, with a bag full of narcotics. “I’ve been played,” stated the doctor. This homeless man was no fool. This experience showed me a side of the homeless population which the Denver Rescue Mission had not been able to. This man was a problem for the system, simply using it to fuel his destructive and wasteful habits. It was men like him which served as anecdotes for those opposed to helping the unfortunate in society. It was from him that attribution errors and stereotypes were derived. The day ended on this unfortunate note, adding to many defeats for the day. Nonetheless, many victories had been won between bouts of helplessness, and the IOC had done its job. Dr. Blum asked me to return for another week, a welcome bit of news for one who had not wholly expected it.

Journal Entries Week 6/30 – 7/5

Journal Entries Week 6/30 – 7/5

Monday:          At the beginning of the week, I put a few more hours at the Denver Rescue Mission Lawrence Street Shelter. I served food to hundreds of people suffering from homelessness and spent more time in the contact office, where beds were reserved and resources were given out. A friend came with me, and presented the opportunity to learn more about the state of homelessness in Denver, as staff at the shelter explained the issues at hand to my friend. Homelessness is not any easy fix, of course, but is not even easy to treat. Only so many can be housed each night, and many more do not wish to be, the director of the contact office stated. All of this, I knew, but the instruction served to remind me of how complex the issue truly is. I wondered why it was that many resisted help out of homelessness, even in the form of shelters. Those on the streets are, much of the time, there by their own will. It occurred to me that there was at least a possibility that those who reject the resources available may have problems with conformity. This leads many to plain delinquency, but may drive others to simply reject traditional opportunities for help. Finding a way to encourage these people to pursue prospects for a better present or future is of the utmost importance. I left the facility, knowing I might not be back for some time, as my clinical shadowing opportunities became greater.
                   
Wednesday:    Wednesday began my short, periodic times in the Academy Park Pediatric Clinic. The facility specializes in primary care and happened to be the headquarters of my primary care physician throughout childhood, Dr. Afrsten. The day was not an incredibly eventful one, but a worthwhile one, nonetheless. I was introduced to a staff of nurses and the second doctor who was there for the day, Dr. Goldberg. As patients came in, the nurses prepared them for the doctor and took care of any vital signs and preliminary questions which needed to be asked. Then, the doctor spent a small amount of time with the patient and administered whatever sort of diagnosis that was called for. Each patient was in and out quickly, and the doctors only spend around 10 minutes with the patient each time they were in the room. There were simply too many patients to see to allow for more. And, on top of that, the needed paperwork and documentation, which was predominantly typed into computer systems, needed to be completed between each patient and the next. Though the doctors went about their duties calmly, there was a presiding feeling that there was no time to waste. Certainly, I would expect nothing less from a physician.
Babies were examined and immunized, children’s growth was assessed, and small infections and sprained joints were treated. Yet the most important lessons of the day were not of medical origin, but rather focused on the way that doctors interact with patients. The physicians of Academy Park were rushed, but never conveyed it to the patients, or even very much to the nurses. Their composure presented a confidence and trustworthiness which calmed those around them. Then, when a complicated situation came up, all involved were ready to face it logically and swiftly. I hoped one day to be able to present such character in my own practice. If I am able to rise to nearly the standard that the doctors who I was able to spend time with did, I would consider myself a very successful man indeed. I realized that this sort of life was, in one way, something that I sought in order to attain self-actualization. The doctors I experienced each had found something which fulfilled them. Perhaps it says something about me that this is the sort of thing I aspired to, reflecting something of my own superego. What I find to be moral and right drives me, but also defines me. Freud himself would likely have a great deal to say about the matter, I am sure.

Saturday:         On Saturday, I returned to Academy Park Pediatrics for a second half day. This time I was to shadow both Dr. Arfsten and Dr. Nicholson, with a familiar batch of nurses helping out. The morning began with a steady torrent of babies with caring mothers and fathers. Some were in for a quick check or an immunization; others were experiencing minor or concerning problems and needed treatment. Yet all seemed to be in stark contrast to the men and women I had been working with in previous weeks at shelters and food banks. Many on the streets had grown up on the streets or had never experienced the loving personalities which the parents who came into the office with their children displayed. Many of the homeless at the shelter had children and would likely never be able to care for them in the way that those at Academy Parks could. The children who were seen here could expect warm clothes, meals, houses. The children on the street or even in indigent neighborhoods would likely never experience these things. Thus poverty would perpetuate poverty, as it always does. This sort of socio-economic trend raised its own psychological questions, but after my time at the Denver Rescue Mission, it seemed as if the differences which separated the fortunate from the unfortunate were determined, by genetics or by environment. No baby chooses to be born onto the streets. Similarly, no child chooses to be born into affluence. But where someone is born is irremovable from their future, perhaps even existing as the most powerful influence into who a person becomes.

Later in the morning, my mind was torn from socio-economic principles and returned to medicine. A boy came in with a severely reddened and swollen tongue, typical of a condition called Glossitis. The boy was in immense pain, but there was little to do, other than monitor diet for something which could be causing a reaction and ensure that infections didn’t take place. Recommendations of ibuprofen were made and the child was sent on his way. Next came too potential ear infections: one that existed and one that did not. Of course, many mothers and fathers who came in with children were just being overly-cautious about something non-threatening. Such was the case with a boy who was in slight pain, but had no typical presentations of an ear infection. He was sent on his way, with instructions to come back if it worsened. The next eardrum I looked at, however, was incredibly red and slightly swollen. This child’s pain was, no doubt, caused by an infection. Antibiotics were prescribed and similar instructions given as to the last person, albeit with a bit more concern. As the day came to a close, I wondered if a homeless man, woman, or family would likely even seek care for these conditions. And if they did, would they be able to find the quality that exists in the insurance-dominant practices of the suburbs?

Journal Entries Week 6/23 – 6/26

Journal Entries Week 6/23 – 6/26

Monday:          On Monday, I returned to the Lawrence Street Center, where I prepared and served food, for most of the day. I planned to return later in the week, for a different type of experience.

Wednesday:    On Wednesday, though I returned to the Lawrence Street Center, I spent my time within the Contact Office, where those at the shelter came to get any number of necessities such as bath soap or toilet paper. In addition, those who desired a place to sleep for the night called in or came in person to reserve a bed, while they were available, and a mat, when they were not. However, in order to be provided a bed sheet and a blanket, each person was required to take a shower and present their wet towel. This way, the hygiene of the sleeping area was preserved. In addition, this served as a far slighter variety of socialization than that at the Crossing. If habits could be created concerning cleanliness, those on the streets might be able to escape their situations. While in the office, many bizarre events took place, from the appearance of a strung out woman who needed an escort from the building, to the recital of a song about homelessness called “On the Block,” written and performed by a man who stayed the night at the shelter frequently. The song centered on addiction to crack cocaine and use of prostitutes. The reality of the situation is that these habits were part of why this man and others remained homeless. And yet, these activities were also some of the only past-times available to people on the streets. It was a sub-culture in and of itself. Back in the Contact Office, once the deadline to secure a place to sleep passed, I witnessed the distraught reactions of those who would have to hope for vacancies, but would likely sleep on the streets for the night. I left the shelter as those who stayed the night swarmed in. The ability to return to my home stood in stark contrast to those who would spend the night on a mat in the shelter. I wished I could do more.


Thursday:        On the 26th, I began by interviewing and briefly shadowing the clinical psychologist at the Crossing. She explained the unique issues that homeless individuals deal with. In her experience, while mental health issues such as bipolar disorder are no more frequent among the homeless than in the general population, depression, PTSD, and attachment disorders were pervasive. Many experience the lowest period of their life while homeless, and bring with them all of the issues which caused them to be on the streets. If they do not already struggle with building relationships, they may do so by the time they have experienced homelessness for a prolonged period of time. According to her, the reason escape from homelessness is so difficult is because it must take place not following a down spiral, but during one that is still occurring. In addition, it is ambiguous whether homelessness is the responsibility of an individual or society itself. When the individual is found to be at fault, there is still question about whether nature or nurture are responsible for personality flaws. The psychologist supervised a group of interns and psychologists who worked with the people in the programs to enforce the mandatory therapies needed and provide extra therapy to those who desired it. Apparently, this was something that occurred quite often. I continued my day by working another shift in the kitchen, then finished for the week.

Journal Entries Week 6/17 – 6/20

Journal Entries Week 6/17 – 6/20

Tuesday:         Tuesday, I spent another long day at the Lawrence Street Center. Much like my other experiences at the shelter, I was able to work alongside the staff and volunteers in preparing and serving food. I sat down in a few offices to get to know more of the services provided for the homeless. The experience was, as always, humbling. One man, who frequently came through the line, made a habit of thanking each volunteer personally for their work before leaving. His gratitude came with the utmost sincerely, and a staff member mentioned to me, “Every time he says that, it makes it all worth it.” He gestured to a man who had sneered at the food, and continued, “Even with the guys like that, it’s worth it when he says, ‘thank you.’” There was something strangely invigorating about gratitude from a single man among many who did not express it. I realized that I had stereotyped the man. I had simply assumed that all of the people who I was serving simply lacked the social cordiality to treat me as well as I had treated them, almost like a sort of ultimate attribution error. I hoped to have made this mistake for the last time. This, of course, was likely a tendency that would take much longer to break.

Thursday:        On the 19th, I returned to the Crossing for a second time to serve food to the people in the programs housed there. This time, however, I was able to take a tour of the facilities, meet the volunteer coordinator, and speak with administrators of the facility. It represented a snapshot of the life lived at the Crossing. Residents work, foster better social habits, and gain connections within communities which they might be able to integrate into one day. After reading ahead to personality models, I reflected that this sort of reconditioning and socialization. It seemed that the programs at the Crossing sought to change habits and dispositions of the unfortunate, in the hopes that they could then reintroduce themselves as productive members of society. If these efforts worked, they would be ample evidence for behavioristic, and nurture-based models. However, if relapse was more likely than not, the contrary would be true, favoring biological, psycho-analytic, and nature-based models. Later in the day, I was able to spend time with in a mobile clinic with a doctor and two nurses who did regular check-ups on the residents. They spoke to me about the work they did and helped to introduce me to connections at Stout St. Clinic.


Friday:             On the last day of the week, I returned to the Lawrence Street Center for the breakfast meal, and attended a meeting with the director of the facility, who was very interested in my volunteering and time with the Denver Rescue Mission. He outlined the way that the shelter was run and put me in contact with the head of the Contact Office, where people experiencing homelessness come to reserve a room. I planned to volunteer there more regularly, in addition to my time in the kitchens.

Journal Entries Week 6/10 – 6/13

Journal Entries Week 6/10 – 6/13

Tuesday:         My first day volunteering at the Denver Rescue Mission was incredibly eye opening. I began at the “Crossing” facility, in North Denver. This facility houses multiple programs designed to house and feed people suffering from addiction and homelessness. All who take part in the program do so in order to clean up their lives, and are there anywhere from one year to three, as they complete multiple stages of rehabilitation geared at socialization into society. Even those working within the kitchen and administrative staff were, at one time or another, part of the rehabilitation programs present. This meant that my presence in the kitchen served a dual purpose for my Summer Practicum project: I was able to do a service for a population of recently homeless individuals and I was able to do some first-hand research on the stories behind the men and women who had been there. I began evaluating the causes which bring someone into homelessness, and what psychological factors might be responsible. Though the nature and nurture debate rages over characteristic such as intelligence and disposition, the potential effects of each model may have effects on how a person’s life plays out. Nature and/or nurture may even lead someone to fall into homelessness or lack the ability to escape it when born into disadvantageous circumstances.

Wednesday:    On the 11th, I began volunteering at a rather different location than the one I had been at the previous day. At the Lawrence Street Center, rather than a live-in community of recently homeless individuals, people living on the streets nearby come for food and shelter each day, but do not commit to any long term programs, like at the Crossing. Some who come through often appear to be strung out on one form of addictive substance or another. Others seem disabled physically or mentally. Some seem all but nonresponsive. But the most surprising group of people included those who were completely normal. But it really should not be so surprising. Perfectly normal people experience bad luck. Perfectly normal people make mistakes. For the most part, the people volunteering were like the people on staff, who were like the people who walked through the food line. My grasp of homelessness expanded with each tray I handed out. Experiences with populations facing homelessness serve to dispel many ideas and perceptions which society tends to hold. Though debate still exists about what drives people into unfortunate circumstances, a commonly held belief is that those who have strong wills and positive characteristics succeed and that those who do not fail. Yet those at the Denver Rescue Mission served to immediately dispel this as a case of fundamental attribution errors. Many could have been in my place, had only circumstances been different. Assuming that the position that any homeless person is in is predominantly their own fault and not due to situational and environmental causes is as mistaken as attributing any one attribute to a race or culture.

Thursday:        On Thursday, I returned to the Lawrence Street Shelter again, though for a much longer period of time. I served multiple meals and worked closely with members of the staff and individuals who were a part of the programs at the Crossing but worked in the shelter. From the opinions of those working beside me, I gleaned that those who did not participate in the programs offered did so for two reasons. Either they still thought they could escape the streets by themselves or they were comfortable with where they were. Some tried to participate in the programs and failed, but the young men who supervised me seemed to feel confident that they would make it off of the streets and into a better life. There was a predominant idea, however, that it was not simply social loafing which kept people from success. After preparing each meal, as food was served, some familiar faces came through the line, as well as some new ones. Caring for these strangers was easy for the Denver Rescue Mission, and they did not expect anything in return. This served to further support my theory against the fundamental attribution error, and help me begin to empathize further with those around me.


Friday:             On the last day of the week, I volunteered once more at the shelter, but also had occasion to talk with a chaplain who supervised much of the programming at the facility. I had time for a short interview about what he did at the shelter and whether he knew of doctors whom I could spend some time with. He was very helpful, giving me a broader conception of the Lawrence Street Center and recommending that I spend time in the clinic nearby. My week finished with another meal prepared and served. I began to think about altruism, and whether it could ever exist in the context that psychology defines it. Many who helped the homeless did so because they were required to, in one way or another. The staff cared, but also earned a livelihood doing so. While I myself volunteered and met volunteers around me, it occurred to me that even those who did so willfully may have derived a pleasure from helping others. This, in an abstract sense, still invalidates requirements for truly altruistic pursuits. If someone feels the need to help others, even if simply to feel some sort of warm feeling within themselves, than fulfilling that need may simply be another selfish action. Though it serves a purpose, helping others may never truly be done only to help others.